Please discuss 200-300 words:
Nowadays, most psychoanalytically oriented counselors prefer to dialogue with their clients face to face. What do you think is gained and what is lost in the face-to-face format? Do you think that the basic tools of psychoanalysis identified by Ikonen (2002) become more effective or less effective in the face-to-face interaction?
Need Help Writing an Essay?
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project
Get Help Now!Please cite from reading materials (files attached).
© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com March 22, 2019, 12:45 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/psychology/abnormal-psychology/psychodynamically-oriented-counseling-511820
Solution Preview
Freud’s work in psychoanalysis is classic – and as you perhaps know – he would have his clients sit in a couch and he would sit with his back turned-behind the client (not face-to-face) – but could see the body language they were displaying. They would lie on the couch and be encouraged to be candid and to speak freely – (Free association, Freud called this). He would then probe, by stopping to ask questions and telling clients to explore their thoughts and their minds. That said; most counselors prefer to speak or dialogue face to face and interact with their clients these days. I believe there are disadvantages and advantages to interact directly and indirectly. I also believe the basic tools of psychoanalysis identified by Ikonen (2002) stands-if the basic premise and aim will not be effective if counselors are not cognizant and adhere to the tenets of psychoanalysis. become more effective or less effective in the face-to-face interaction? …
Guaranteed A+Stop Stressing. Your Academic Success is Guaranteed.
Domyassignment is your direct route to higher grades. Thousands of students trust our PhD-level experts to deliver 100% original, custom-written papers—from tough essays to massive dissertations.
